\n
![\"WIN_20140617_030041\"](\"http:\/\/blog.pixelgiraffe.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/WIN_20140617_030041-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/p>\nLight polluted balcony, several street lamps and yard lights, full moon close to Cygnus, bright northern summer sky. I could only see three stars of Cygnus, making it hard to locate the dumbbell nebula.
\n<\/p>\n
If you think our ten flower pot lights are crazy, check out the color changing lights on the far left…<\/p>\n
![\"WIN_20140617_030119\"](\"http:\/\/blog.pixelgiraffe.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/WIN_20140617_030119-e1402967148183-576x1024.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Even more lights to the right…<\/p>\n
![\"WIN_20140617_030126\"](\"http:\/\/blog.pixelgiraffe.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/WIN_20140617_030126-e1402967244901-576x1024.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Moooooooon through 20mm Erfle, Heritage 130p. The magnificent star cluster M13 was very easy to spot, but not so magnificent. It was just a fuzzy cloud. Under balcony-conditions all I ever saw was a blob with lots of stars indirectly, when looking away from it a bit. This time, it did not show stars, neither with the 12, 8, 6 or 3,2mm eyepiece.<\/p>\n Here, about inbetween, should be the ring nebula \ud83d\ude09 The dumbbell nebula appears a bit larger but the typical shape was not visible to me under these conditions, and it’s closer to the bright moon, too. The most obvious effect of the CLS filter was with the 3,2mm. Without filter I was not sure if I could see the nebula indirectly, with filter it became visible again. In the 12mm Erfle and 8mm HR Planetary there was a hint of shape but not very much.<\/p>\n My favorite double star, the pretty Albireo. That’s it. Clouds, and from my balcony the view was limited. Taking snapshots with a Dell Venue 8 Pro Tablet was tricky, as expected. With tracking, it’s a nice low resolution deep sky imaging device.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Light polluted balcony, several street lamps and yard lights, full moon close to Cygnus, bright northern summer sky. I could only see three stars of Cygnus, making it hard to locate the dumbbell nebula. If you think our ten flower … Weiterlesen
\n![\"mooc\"](\"http:\/\/blog.pixelgiraffe.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/mooc.jpg\")
<\/a>
\nEven nicer in 8mm and 3,2mm!<\/p>\n
\n<\/a>
\nIt is obvious that it’s not a star with 20mm (650mm focal length -> 33x), in 12mm it is barely recognizable as a small ring though not as easily recognizable as under dark skies where it is very obvious directly.
\nThe TS CLS filter actually helps, but just a tad.<\/p>\n
\nPictures can not describe how nice it is to find it for your first time, the color difference makes the star appear like gems on black velvet.
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\nSaturn was visible nicely in 3,2mm, 200x. A bit blurry due to seeing in the 2,5mm – 260x.
\nIt disappeared behind a house before I could take a snapshot.<\/p>\n
\nShining into the tube with my cellphone to find the eyepiece in the dark helped aligning the tablet.
\nThis type of astro photography has the worst results and is the most frustrating.
\nGet a X Box webcam for 7 Euro at ebay international or a CCTV camera module for 22 to 40 Euro, using a cellphone or tablet sucks, and is not sensitive enough.
\nWith the CCTV camera, you can reach at least the visual impression, without tracking.
\nhttp:\/\/www.ringohr.de\/tmp6\/RingNebel_3.png
\nhttp:\/\/www.ringohr.de\/tmp6\/\/Capture%2001.12.2013%2023_56_30.png
\nhttp:\/\/www.ringohr.de\/tmp6\/orion-.png<\/p>\n<\/a>